Sorry but I don"t think I can know, because it"s a definition. Please tell me. Ns don"t think that $0=emptyset,$ because I distinguish between empty collection and the value $0$. Carry out all sets, also the empty set, have infitinite emptiness e.g. Do all sets consisting of the empty set contain infinitely many empty sets?


*

There is only one empty set. The is a subset of every set, consisting of itself. Each set only contains it once as a subset, no an infinite variety of times.

You are watching: Every set is a subset of itself


*

let $A$ and $B$ be sets. If every element $ain A$ is likewise an facet of $B$, climate $Asubseteq B$.

Flip the around and you get

If $A otsubseteq B$, then there exists some aspect $xin A$ such that $x otin B$.

If $A$ is the empty set, there space no $x$s in $A$, for this reason in details there are no $x$s in $A$ that room not in $B$. For this reason $A otsubseteq B$ can"t it is in true. Furthermore, note that we haven"t used any kind of property of $B$ in the ahead line, so this uses to every collection $B$, consisting of $B=emptyset$.

(From a wider standpoint, you can think of the empty set as the collection for which $xin emptysetimplies P$ is true because that every explain $P$. For example, every $x$ in the empty set is orange; also, every $x$ in the emptyset is no orange. There is no contradiction in one of two people of this statements because there are no $x$"s i beg your pardon could carry out counterexamples.)


re-superstructure
point out
follow
edited Oct 7 "17 in ~ 20:48
answered Mar 20 "13 in ~ 8:45
*

Alexander Gruber♦Alexander Gruber
26.2k3030 gold badges118118 silver badges197197 bronze title
$endgroup$
add a comment |
6
$egingroup$
The empty set is subset of the north set, together every element of the empty collection is an facet of the empty set. But $0$ is no in the north set.

$A subseteq B$ when $xin A implies xin B$. Together $xin A iff xin A$ we see that $A subseteq A$ is always true, when $A$ is a set.

A value is a value not a set, sometimes $0$ is defined as the empty set but climate $0$ is the empty collection and not the number.

This wake up for example in category theory, as you are only interested in summary sets, and all set of the same cardinality are in a sense the same, you simply title finite sets by their cardinality.


re-publishing
point out
follow
edited Mar 19 "13 in ~ 11:32
answered Mar 19 "13 at 11:21
*

Dominic MichaelisDominic Michaelis
19.4k44 yellow badges4242 silver badges7575 bronze badges
$endgroup$
include a comment |
5
$egingroup$
Any collection is a subset the itself. Allow be$$A=x,vert,varphi(x).$$As$$varphi(x)implies varphi(x),$$we have$$Asubseteq A.$$


share
point out
monitor
answered Dec 4 "14 in ~ 8:19
*

Martín-Blas Pérez PinillaMartín-Blas Pérez Pinilla
39.6k44 gold badges4141 silver badges8484 bronze title
$endgroup$
add a comment |
3
$egingroup$
Because the reflexivity that $subseteq$, for all $A$ collection $A subseteq A$ is true. For $A = emptyset$ we have actually that $emptyset subseteq emptyset$, for this reason the empty collection is a subset of itself.


re-superstructure
point out
monitor
answered Dec 7 "14 at 17:09
user153012user153012
11.4k33 gold badges3232 silver badges9898 bronze badges
$endgroup$
include a comment |
1
$egingroup$
The intersection of 2 sets is a subset of each of the initial sets. So if $phi$ is empty set and A is any set then $ phicap A $ is $phi$ which way $phi$ is subset the A(which is any set) and $phi$ is a subset the $phi$ which suggests empty set is subset the itself.


share
cite
monitor
answer Mar 8 "16 in ~ 5:53
Ashish PaniAshish Pani
14755 bronze badges
$endgroup$
include a comment |
0
$egingroup$
By the definition of subset this question means:Is every facet of the empty collection a member of the north set?The answer must be yes, because the empty set doesn"t contain any type of elements.


share
cite
monitor
answered Feb 11 "18 at 5:46
ANorellANorell
1
$endgroup$
include a comment |
-1
$egingroup$
An empty subset have the right to be selected from any set, consisting of the empty set itself, using selection criteria that cannot be satisfied, e.g. Picking those elements $x$ such that $x eq x$.

See mine formal proof (in DC evidence format) at: http://dcproof.com/ExistenseOfNullSet.htm

There is just one empty set. If $phi_1$ and also $phi_2$ are empty sets, then $ phi_1 = phi_2$.

See my formal proof (in DC evidence format) at: http://dcproof.com/UniquenessOfNullSet.htm

Edit: for any collection $X$ we can pick an north subset $S$ such that:

$forall a:$

or

$forall a:$


share
cite
monitor
edited jan 22 at 4:03
answer Mar 20 "13 at 16:49
Dan ChristensenDan Christensen
12.6k22 gold badges2222 silver- badges4444 bronze badges
$endgroup$
1
add a comment |

her Answer


Thanks for contributing an answer to centregalilee.com Stack Exchange!

Please be sure to answer the question. Carry out details and also share your research!

But avoid

Asking because that help, clarification, or responding to other answers.Making statements based on opinion; ago them up with referrals or personal experience.

Use centregalilee.comJax to format equations. centregalilee.comJax reference.

To find out more, see our tips on writing good answers.

See more: 2004 Dodge Neon Oil Light Comes On, My Check Oil Light Keeps Coming On And Off When


Draft saved
Draft discarded

Sign up or log in


sign up using Google
sign up using Facebook
authorize up utilizing Email and also Password
submit

Post together a guest


surname
email Required, however never shown


Post together a guest


surname
email

Required, but never shown


short article Your prize Discard

By clicking “Post her Answer”, friend agree to our regards to service, privacy policy and cookie policy


Not the prize you're feather for? Browse various other questions tagged elementary-set-theory logic definition or ask your very own question.


Featured top top Meta
Linked
3
Since is a subset of every set, that is a subset that itself? and also hence = ?
1
Is the empty set a superset that itself?
25
Is $\emptyset$ a subset the $\emptyset\$?
12
Empty set does not belong to north set
4
Is words "empty" in set theory different from the word "empty" in ordinary language?
9
Is $emptyset in emptyset$ or $emptyset subseteq emptyset$?
2
Why are complete lattices non-empty?
0
Intersection of a non-empty collection
related
12
Nonempty set mapped come $emptyset$ and vice-versa
0
Prove the adhering to statement: If $E$ is one empty collection and $A subseteq E$, climate $A$ is an empty set.
2
set definitions v empty set
3
If the empty set is a subset of every set, why isn't $\emptyset,a\=\a\$?
1
Russell's Paradox for the zero set and a collection with the zero set.
3
collection of attributes from empty collection to $,1$
3
understanding empty set, set with empty collection and set with collection of empty set.
warm Network questions an ext hot questions

question feed
subscribe to RSS
question feed To i ordered it to this RSS feed, copy and also paste this URL into your RSS reader.


centregalilee.com
firm
stack Exchange Network
site design / logo design © 2021 stack Exchange Inc; user contributions license is granted under cc by-sa. Rev2021.10.22.40552


centregalilee.comematics ridge Exchange works best with JavaScript enabled
*

your privacy

By clicking “Accept all cookies”, friend agree stack Exchange have the right to store cookies on your an equipment and disclose information in accordance v our Cookie Policy.