Here is a short write-up I have written for the brand-new edition the Exploring the new Testament vol 2 giving summary of an essential methods.

You are watching: What is the historical critical approach to studying the bible

Critical techniques in the examine of the brand-new Testament

In bespeak to aid to answer several of the questions raised here, new Testament research studies as a discipline has emerged a variety of approaches. An extremely often these are obtained from neighbouring self-controls within the university, do theology other of one interdisciplinary subject.

Historical Criticism

Historical criticism, sometimes called the historical crucial method, is concerned with creating historical realities the might influence our understanding of what a text means. It prospered out that the development of interest in classical background and archaeology in the eighteenth and nineteenth century and as component of a search for much more ‘objectivity’ in biblical interpretation. So, for example, we could be interested in the society make-up the the population of Corinth, and its call for (what us would currently call) entrepreneurial initiative, in make the efforts to uncover a context because that Paul’s conversation of team rivalries in 1 Cor 1 to 4.

Form Criticism

This approach, much more commonly offered in examine of the gospels, is involved with the kind that passages take, and also what this could tell us around their use before inclusion within the written messages as we have actually them. So it is generally held that both Phil 2.6–11 and Col 1.15–20 consist of pre-Pauline hymns that Paul has incorporated into his letters—purely on the basis of their composed form.

Source Criticism

Again, this self-control is most came to with the source documents of the gospels, but additionally is offered in the examine of letters. We have actually seen that most scholars think that what we speak to 2 Corinthians is composed of two or more earlier records which have actually been brought together (see pp 92­–95). Over there are also several theories about the composition of the publication of Revelation, either together originating together a series of visions over a long duration of time, or as a text which has actually been editing once, double or also three times!

Redaction Criticism

This focuses on the means an writer has made usage of his (or her) sources and shapes the material to offer a distinctive perspective, so again has been made usage of in relation to the synoptic gospels. However there proceeds to be substantial debate about the relation between Paul’s portrayal of himself in his letters and also the means Luke to edit his resources to depict Paul in Acts, highlighting some of Luke’s details concerns already evident indigenous his gospel.

Textual Criticism

We have actually literally hundreds of manuscripts and also manuscript fragments from the early on centuries, and these have actually some sport in them. Textual criticism is the technique of deciding i m sorry is the most most likely original text. Because that the huge majority, over there is tiny significance in the variations, and these perform not affect any vital doctrinal issues. Yet on part occasions the variations add to conversation of an important issue. Because that example, we have actually already detailed (p 87) the some beforehand manuscripts execute not encompass Paul’s injunction for females to be silent in 1 Cor 14.34–35, and also this is a proceeding subject the debate.

Canonical Criticism

‘Canon’ is the Greek word because that reed or measure up rod, and the ‘canon’ of bible refers both come the rule of life the Scripture invites united state into, but additionally the ‘rule’ governing what we incorporate in what we contact Scripture. Canonical criticism is pertained to with analysis one part of the brand-new Testament in the paper definition of what else the brand-new Testament (and, ultimately, the totality Bible) says. For this reason we need to read what James says around faith, works and also the example of Abraham (James 2.14–26) in the light of what Paul says around faith, works and also the instance of Abraham (Romans 4) and also vice versa.

Literary Criticism

This is the name offered to a variety of approaches which have become important in the last 40 years and derive from an ext general viewpoints to literature. They are involved with knowledge the shape and effect that the text as we have actually it. Narrative criticism looks in ~ the vital features that stories and also how they work. Of particular importance come the NT letters, rhetorical criticism is came to with the shape and effect of messages as saying a case. Because that example, in 1 Cor 15 us can find either three categories the rhetoric according to Greek thinking, or four categories follow to Latin thinking, and this gives important insights right into the way Paul is making his case. For one more example, check out the discussion of rhetoric in Philippians ~ above pages 135–6.

Socio-Rhetorical Criticism

An necessary area of recent development, this approach seeks come combine elements of literary criticism and historical criticism, in trying out the rhetorical influence of texts for their first audience. Championed specifically by Ben Witherington III, it requires attending both come the rhetorical shape of the text and what we know of the expectations of initial readers in their historical context. (It is distinctive from so-called ‘social-scientific’ reading, i m sorry is much more controversial.)

Reception background and Reader-response Criticism

The research of a text’s ‘reception history’ is concerned not so lot with the message itself, yet how it has been read and interpreted end the centuries. The publication of Revelation has actually been review in an nearly bewildering range of ways, numerous of which have been very influential in the church and in culture, and this provides us some hints as the nature the the text. Closely related come this, reader-response criticism explores the methods in i m sorry readers have or can have comment to a text.

Ideology Criticism

Ideology criticism covers a variety of approaches in i beg your pardon the ideology system perspective or convictions the the critic form a key part of the strategy to the text. This ideology system position can be in relation to wealth and also poverty (liberation readings), issues of gender and also sexuality (feminist and also gay readings) or an international politics (post-colonial readings). These philosophies highlight the truth that no reader philosophies texts from a ‘neutral’ allude of view, however brings intellectual, philosophical and cultural assumptions which form the task of interpretation.

These viewpoints are best understood together addressing concerns in various stages that the writing and also reading of the brand-new Testament, trying out either the civilization ‘behind’ the text (historical, form, source, redaction), the human being ‘of’ the message (textual, canonical and literary, through socio-rhetorical bridging these 2 worlds) or the world ‘in former of’ the message (reception, reader-response and ideology criticism).

See more: How Many Syllables Are In Everyone ? Divide Everyone Into Syllables

None of this methodologies is value-neutral, in the they all do assumptions around the nature of reality and how we can be confident around the fact of assertions made around the messages in question. However, the various methods make presumptions in various ways. For example, historical an important approaches make assumptions around what type of proof may be offered in reconstructing the nature the (for instance) the first-century world. At the other finish of the spectrum, ideology objections will typically make ideological assumptions, such together prioritising the experience or perspectives that a specific group, despite this is often done to lug a counter-perspective come what is viewed as the previously leading interest group in analysis these texts.