Identify just how to view traditional Reduction Potentials indigenous the perspective of viable reducing and oxidizing agents in oxidation reactions.

You are watching: Which substance is the strongest oxidizing agent


We deserve to measure the traditional potentials because that a wide range of centregalilee.comistry substances, several of which are detailed in Table P2. This data permit us to to compare the oxidative and reductive toughness of a selection of substances. The half-reaction because that the traditional hydrogen electrode (SHE) lies more than halfway under the perform in Table (PageIndex1). Every reactants that lie listed below the SHE in the table space stronger oxidants 보다 H+, and all those that lie above the SHE room weaker. The strongest oxidant in the table is F2, with a standard electrode potential that 2.87 V. This high value is consistent with the high electronegativity of fluorine and tells us that fluorine has actually a stronger tendency to accept electrons (it is a stronger oxidant) than any other element.

Table (PageIndex1): typical Potentials because that Selected reduction Half-Reactions at 25°C Half-Reaction E° (V)
Li+(aq) + e− ( ightleftharpoons) Li(s) –3.040
Be2+(aq) + 2e− ( ightleftharpoons) Be(s) –1.99
Al3+(aq) + 3e− ( ightleftharpoons) Al(s) –1.676
Zn2+(aq) + 2e− ( ightleftharpoons) Zn(s) –0.7618
Ag2S(s) + 2e− ( ightleftharpoons) 2Ag(s) + S2−(aq) –0.71
Fe2+(aq) + 2e− ( ightleftharpoons) Fe(s) –0.44
Cr3+(aq) + e− ( ightleftharpoons) Cr2+(aq) –0.424
Cd2+(aq) + 2e− ( ightleftharpoons) Cd(s) –0.4030
PbSO4(s) + 2e− ( ightleftharpoons) Pb(s) + SO42−(aq) –0.356
Ni2+(aq) + 2e− ( ightleftharpoons) Ni(s) –0.257
2SO42−(aq) + 4H+(aq) + 2e− ( ightleftharpoons) S2O62−(aq) + 2H2O(l) –0.25
Sn2+(aq) + 2e− ( ightleftharpoons) Sn(s) −0.14
2H+(aq) + 2e− ( ightleftharpoons) H2(g) 0.00
Sn4+(aq) + 2e− ( ightleftharpoons) Sn2+(aq) 0.154
Cu2+(aq) + e− ( ightleftharpoons) Cu+(aq) 0.159
AgCl(s) + e− ( ightleftharpoons) Ag(s) + Cl−(aq) 0.2223
Cu2+(aq) + 2e− ( ightleftharpoons) Cu(s) 0.3419
O2(g) + 2H2O(l) + 4e− ( ightleftharpoons) 4OH−(aq) 0.401
H2SO3(aq) + 4H+(aq) + 4e− ( ightleftharpoons) S(s) + 3H2O(l) 0.45
I2(s) + 2e− ( ightleftharpoons) 2I−(aq) 0.5355
MnO42−(aq) + 2H2O(l) + 2e− ( ightleftharpoons) MnO2(s) + 4OH−(aq) 0.60
O2(g) + 2H+(aq) + 2e− ( ightleftharpoons) H2O2(aq) 0.695
H2SeO3(aq) + 4H+ + 4e− ( ightleftharpoons) Se(s) + 3H2O(l) 0.74
Fe3+(aq) + e− ( ightleftharpoons) Fe2+(aq) 0.771
Ag+(aq) + e− ( ightleftharpoons) Ag(s) 0.7996
NO3−(aq) + 3H+(aq) + 2e− ( ightleftharpoons)​ HNO2(aq) + H2O(l) 0.94
Br2(aq) + 2e− ( ightleftharpoons) 2Br−(aq) 1.087
MnO2(s) + 4H+(aq) + 2e− ( ightleftharpoons)​ Mn2+(aq) + 2H2O(l) 1.23
O2(g) + 4H+(aq) + 4e− ( ightleftharpoons) 2H2O(l) 1.229
Cr2O72−(aq) + 14H+(aq) + 6e− ( ightleftharpoons) 2Cr3+(aq) + 7H2O(l) 1.36
Cl2(g) + 2e− ( ightleftharpoons) 2Cl−(aq) 1.396
(Ce^4+(aq) + e^− ightleftharpoons Ce^3+(aq)) 1.61
PbO2(s) + HSO4−(aq) + 3H+(aq) + 2e− ( ightleftharpoons) PbSO4(s) + 2H2O(l) 1.690
H2O2(aq) + 2H+(aq) + 2e− ( ightleftharpoons)​ 2H2O(l) 1.763
F2(g) + 2e−( ightleftharpoons) 2F−(aq) 2.87

Not every oxidizers and also reducers are produced equal. The typical reduction potentials in Table (PageIndex1) can be interpreted as a ranking the substances follow to your oxidizing and also reducing power. Strong oxidizing agents are commonly compounds with aspects in high oxidation claims or v high electronegativity, which obtain electrons in the redox reaction (Figure (PageIndex1)). Instances of strong oxidizers incorporate hydrogen peroxide, permanganate, and also osmium tetroxide.

See more: The Oxidation Number Of Chlorine In The Compound Fecl3 Is, Fecl2 Oxidation Number

Reducing agents are generally electropositive aspects such as hydrogen, lithium, sodium, iron, and aluminum, which shed electrons in oxidization reactions. Hydrides (compounds that contain hydrogen in the official -1 oxidation state), such as sodium hydride, sodium borohydride and also lithium aluminum hydride, are often used as reducing agents in organic and organometallic reactions.